ik3qar.it ik3qar.it
You are visitor nr. 398320 
lingua italianaVersione in Italiano
On Line Searches
Qsl Manager Lookup
Logs On Line
RTTY interface
IOTA / IIA in EU131
Venice Islands
My IIA activities
Visual WAIS
Last visitors of the site were from:
U.S.A.HungaryItalyNetherlandsSpainSouth KoreaChinaGermany
U.S.A.HungaryItalyNetherlandsSpainSouth KoreaChinaGermany

Which is better: FSK or AFSK?

In the field of RTTY transmissions with audio boards, you can transmit either in FSK or AFSK mode.

In FSK (frequency Shift Keying), the mark and space frequencies in transmission are operated directly by RTX (which thereby must have the FSK mode) through a built-in modulator. Reception is in any case operated by the sound card.
In AFSK (Audio FSK) instead, mark and space are operated by an audio oscillator outside the RTX, which therefore needn't have the FSK mode.
This function is implemented by the PCs’ standard sound cards (e.g. SoundBlaster) and by software like MMTTY, TrueTTY, RITTY, and so on.

Advantages and Disadvantages

Now let's see which are the pros and cons of either mode.
Surely the highlight in AFSK is that due to AFC (Automatic Frequency Control), which modifies the mark's and space's frequencies, the software can automatically "track down" and target perfectly the other station, without having to do it manually with the VFO: this will do both for reception and transmission.
This function is quite useful both when calling and when replying, as you just have to tune in on the station even if approximately and wait (pretty little) for the program to work it out.

On the other hand, as far as I know, the AFSK has a couple of negative aspects, which both have to do with use in contests: when the number of adjacent stations with strong signals is high, you risk "losing" the tuning because the AFC "feels" a stronger signal nearby and moves, targeting the other station: in these cases you should disconnect it, retarget by hand the OM and ask him to repeat the report...

The second disadvantage regards the filters: to be able to use the AFSK, the RTX must be switched to LSB or USB with reverse, if the program allows it; the problem is that not all radios (like mine, a TS940) allow to use the CW's narrow filters even in SSB (whereas in FSK this is possible), which are indispensable in the chaos of the contests in order to "isolate" a single signal.

As to the FSK, the disadvantage is that the AFC can be used only in reception, which makes the manual targeting of your partner indispensable if you want to answer a call.

I can thus say that both the FSK and the AFSK give very good results; the choice of the mode is up you, and depends mainly on the radio you are using and the clogging of the frequency.

Bye and Good RTTY to all!

All material at ik3qar.it Web site Copyright © 2001-2020 IK3QAR. All rights reserved.